The ideas from Section 8.4.2 can be adapted to define a
feedback plan over
using a cover. Let
denote a
discrete state space in which each superstate is a neighborhood. Most
of the components of the associated discrete planning problems are the
same as in Section 8.4.2. The only difference is in the
definition of superactions because neighborhoods can overlap in a
cover. For each neighborhood
, a superaction exists for
each other neighborhood,
such that
(usually, their interiors overlap to yield
).
![]() |
Note that in the case of a cell decomposition, this produces no
superactions because it is a partition. To follow the metaphor of
composing funnels, the domains of some funnels should overlap, as
shown in Figure 8.14. A transition from one
neighborhood, , to another,
, is obtained by defining a vector
field on
that sends all states from
into
; see Figure 8.16. Once
is reached, the vector
field of
is no longer followed; instead, the vector field of
is used. Using the vector field of
, a transition may be applied
to reach another neighborhood. Note that the jump from the vector
field of
to that of
may cause the feedback plan to be a
discontinuous vector field on
. If the cover is designed so
that
is large (if they intersect), then gradual
transitions may be possible by blending the vector fields from
and
.
Once the discrete problem has been defined, a discrete feedback plan
can be computed over
, as defined in Section
8.2. This is converted into a feedback plan over
by defining a vector field on each neighborhood that causes the
appropriate transitions. Each
can be interpreted
both as a superstate and a neighborhood. For each
, the
discrete feedback plan produces a superaction
,
which yields a new neighborhood
. The vector field over
is then designed to send all states into
.
If desired, a navigation function over
can even be
derived from a navigation function,
, over
. Suppose
that
is constructed so that every
is
distinct for every
. Any navigation function can be
easily transformed to satisfy this constraint (because
is
finite). Let
denote a navigation function over some
. Assume that
is a point,
(extensions can be
made to more general cases). For every neighborhood
such
that
,
is defined so that performing
gradient descent leads into the overlapping neighborhood for which
is smallest. If
contains
, the
navigation function
simply guides the state to
.
The navigation functions over each
can be easily pieced
together to yield a navigation function over all of
. In places
where multiple neighborhoods overlap,
is defined to be the
navigation function associated with the neighborhood for which
is smallest. This can be achieved by adding a large
constant to each
. Let
denote a constant for which
over all
and
(it is assumed that
each
is bounded). Suppose that
assumes only
integer values. Let
denote the set of all
such
that
. The navigation function over
is defined as
![]() |
(8.51) |
Steven M LaValle 2020-08-14