The doubly exponential running time of cylindrical algebraic decomposition inspired researchers to do better. It has been shown that quantifier elimination requires doubly exponential time [262]; however, motion planning is a different problem. Canny introduced a method that produces a roadmap directly from the semi-algebraic set, rather than constructing a cell decomposition along the way. Since there are doubly exponentially many cells in the cylindrical algebraic decomposition, avoiding this construction pays off. The resulting roadmap method of Canny solves the motion planning problem in time that is again polynomial in the number of polynomials and polynomial in the algebraic degree, but it is only singly exponential in dimension [170,173]; see also [77].
Much like the other combinatorial motion planning approaches, it is
based on finding critical curves and critical points. The main idea
is to construct linear mappings from
to
that produce
silhouette curves of the semi-algebraic sets. Performing one
such mapping on the original semi-algebraic set yields a roadmap, but
it might not preserve the original connectivity. Therefore, linear
mappings from
to
are performed on some
-dimensional slices of the original semi-algebraic set to yield
more roadmap curves. This process is applied recursively until the
slices are already one-dimensional. The resulting roadmap is formed
from the union of all of the pieces obtained in the recursive calls.
The resulting roadmap has the same connectivity as the original
semi-algebraic set [173].
Suppose that
. Let
denote
the set of polynomials that define the semi-algebraic set, which is
assumed to be a disjoint union of manifolds. Assume that each
. First, a small perturbation to the input
polynomials
is performed to ensure that every sign-invariant
set of
is a manifold. This forces the polynomials into a kind
of general position, which can be achieved with probability one using
random perturbations; there are also deterministic methods to solve
this problem. The general position requirements on the input
polynomials and the 2D projection directions are fairly strong, which
has stimulated more recent work that eliminates many of the problems
[77]. From this point onward, it will be assumed that
the polynomials are in general position.
Recall the sign-assignment function from Section 6.4.1.
Each sign-invariant set is a manifold because of the general position
assumption. Canny's method computes a roadmap for any -dimensional
manifold for
. Such a manifold has precisely
signs that
are 0 (which means that points lie precisely on the zero sets of
polynomials in
). At least one of the signs must be
0, which means that Canny's roadmap actually lies in
(this technically is not permitted, but the algorithm
nevertheless correctly decides whether a solution path exists through
).
Recall that each is a function,
.
Let
denote
. The
polynomials that
have zero signs can be put together sequentially to produce a mapping
. The
th component of the
vector
is
. This is closely related
to the sign assignment function of Section 6.4.1, except
that now the real value from each polynomial is directly used, rather
than taking its sign.
Now introduce a function
, in which
either
or
(the general concepts presented below work for
other values of
, but
and
are the only values needed for
Canny's method). The function
serves the same purpose as a
projection in cylindrical algebraic decomposition, but note that
immediately drops from dimension
to dimension
or
, instead
of dropping to
as in the case of cylindrical projections.
Let
denote a mapping constructed
directly from
and
as follows. For the
th component,
if
, then
. Assume that
. If
, then
. Let
denote the Jacobian of
and be defined at
as
![]() |
(6.29) |
![]() |
(6.30) |
Now suppose that to obtain
, and
suppose
. In this case,
(6.28) becomes
![]() |
(6.31) |
The first mapping in Example 6.7 yielded two isolated
critical points, and the second mapping yielded a one-dimensional set
of critical points, which is referred to as a silhouette. The union of the silhouette and
the isolated critical points yields a roadmap for
. Now
consider generalizing this example to obtain the full algorithm for
general
and
. A linear mapping
is
constructed that might not be axis-aligned as in Example
6.7 because it must be chosen in general position
(otherwise degeneracies might arise in the roadmap). Define
to be the set of polynomials that become zero on the desired manifold
on which to construct a roadmap. Form the matrix (6.28)
and determine the silhouette. This is accomplished in general using
subresultant techniques that were also needed for cylindrical
algebraic decomposition; see [77,173] for details.
Let
denote the first component of
, which yields a mapping
. Forming
using
yields a finite set of critical points. Taking the union of the
critical points and the silhouette produces part of the roadmap.
So far, however, there are no guarantees that the connectivity is
preserved. To handle this problem, Canny's algorithm proceeds
recursively. For each of the critical points
, an
-dimensional hyperplane through
is chosen for which the
row of
is the normal (hence it is perpendicular
in some sense to the flow of
). Inside of this hyperplane, a new
mapping is formed. This time a new direction is chosen, and the
mapping takes the form
. Once again,
the silhouettes and critical points are found and added to the
roadmap. This process is repeated recursively until the base case in
which the silhouettes and critical points are directly obtained
without forming
.
It is helpful to consider an example. Since the method involves a
sequence of 2D projections, it is difficult to visualize.
Problems in
and higher involve two or more 2D projections and
would therefore be more interesting. An example over
is
presented here, even though it unfortunately has only one projection;
see [173] for another example over
.
![]() |
![]() |
To solve a planning problem, the query points and
are artificially declared to be critical points in the top level of
recursion. This forces the algorithm to generate curves that connect
them to the rest of the roadmap.
The completeness of the method requires very careful analysis, which
is thoroughly covered in [77,173]. The main elements
of the analysis are showing that: 1) the polynomials can be perturbed
and can be chosen to ensure general position, 2) the singularity
conditions on
lead to algebraic sets (varieties),
and 3) the resulting roadmap has the required properties mentioned in
Section 6.1 of being accessible and
connectivity-preserving for
(actually it is shown for
). The method explained above computes the roadmap
for each sign-invariant set, but to obtain a roadmap for the planning
problem, the roadmaps from each sign-invariant set must be connected
together correctly; fortunately, this has been solved via the Linking
Lemma of [169]. A major problem, however, is that even after
knowing the connectivity of the roadmap, it is a considerable
challenge to obtain a parameterization of each curve on the roadmap.
For this and many other technical reasons, no general implementation
of Canny's algorithm appears to exist at present. Another problem is
the requirement of a Whitney stratification (which can be fixed by
perturbation of the input). The Basu-Pollack-Roy roadmap
algorithm overcomes this problem [77].
Steven M LaValle 2020-08-14