Temporarily, suppose that the linkage forms a single loop as shown in Figure 7.23. One possible decomposition into active and passive variables is given in Figure 7.24. If constrained to form a loop, the linkage has four degrees of freedom, assuming the bottom link is rigidly attached to the ground. This means that values can be chosen for four active joint angles and the remaining three can be derived from solving the inverse kinematics. To determine , there are three equations and three unknowns. Unfortunately, these equations are nonlinear and fairly complicated. Nevertheless, efficient solutions exist for this case, and the 3D generalization [675]. For a 3D loop formed of revolute joints, there are six passive variables. The number, , of passive links in and the number for arise from the dimensions of and , respectively. This is the freedom that is stripped away from the system by enforcing the closure constraints. Methods for efficiently computing inverse kinematics in two and three dimensions are given in [30]. These can also be applied to the RDT stepping method in Section 7.4.1, instead of using continuation.

If the maximal number of passive variables is used, there is at most a finite number of solutions to the inverse kinematics problem; this implies that there are often several choices for the passive variable values. It could be the case that for some assignments of active variables, there are no solutions to the inverse kinematics. An example is depicted in Figure 7.25. Suppose that we want to generate samples in by selecting random values for and then using inverse kinematics for . What is the probability that a solution to the inverse kinematics exists? For the example shown, it appears that solutions would not exist in most trials.

Steven M LaValle 2020-08-14